← All cases
Legal · contract review

Contract review that starts from the risky clauses

Reviewing a single contract took four to eight hours of a lawyer's time. The agent reads it first and points at what needs a decision.

Client
Large restaurant chain
Scope
Upload → section detection → risk flags
Baseline
4–8 hours per contract
Role
Solo — design, build, hand-over
Contract risk review interface
Identified risks presented against the company's own contract requirements.
Baseline
4–8h
to review one contract by hand
Checks
Custom
rules defined by the legal team
Decision
Lawyer
the agent flags, never rules
§ 01 / Problem

Four to eight hours before a single clause is negotiated

Lawyers work through contracts to find risks and draft protocols of disagreement — line by line.

Every incoming contract had to be read in full against the company's requirements: what must be present, what must never be. Only after that could the lawyer draft the protocol of disagreement.

At four to eight hours per contract, the reading itself was the bottleneck — not the legal judgement that followed it.

4–8 hper contract review
§ 02 / Solution

An agent that reads against your own rules

The requirements come from the legal team — for example, that a lease must contain no unilateral termination clause.

01

Upload the contract

input

The lawyer uploads the contract into the system through the interface.

02

Read and segment

parse

The agent reads the contract and identifies its sections, so findings can be anchored to a specific place.

03

Check the requirements

risk

Each section is checked against the company's predefined requirements and risky clauses are flagged.

04

Lawyer decides

checkpoint

The lawyer reviews the identified risks and makes the decision — the agent never rules on a clause itself.

§ Built with
PythonLLM analysisDocument parsingRule configurationWeb UI